Release date: October 20, 1997
| Contact:
| Jennifer Day
| Windsor, ON
| (519) 257-6733
|
|
| Bruce Kirschner
| Windsor, ON
| (519) 257-6710
|
International Joint Commission Makes Recommendations on
Government Cleanup Efforts on the Detroit River
In order to facilitate cleanup of the Detroit River, the International Joint Commission (IJC) today
announces the findings and recommendations from its assessment of the U.S. and Canadian
federal, state
and provincial governments' progress to clean up the Detroit River. The report details both
constructive
criticism of identified organizational problems and some notable successes that have occurred
over more
than 10 years of development and implementation of related cleanup activities.
The status assessment is not an environmental audit of the conditions in the Detroit River, but an
assessment of ongoing remediation efforts by the responsible governments, with Michigan
Department
of Environmental Quality responsible as lead agency, and related activities valuable to the
restoration
process. Commissioners met with local citizens, representatives of government agencies,
industries, local
municipalities, non-governmental organizations and the media to collect information during the
assessment.
"Based on our experience with the successes and problems encountered by other Areas of
Concern around the Great Lakes, IJC hopes the greatest utility of our findings and
recommendations will
be to facilitate constructive interaction among the various government agencies and local
organizations
to the benefit of this important local and binational resource," says IJC Great Lakes Regional
Office
Director Douglas McTavish.
IJC's findings regarding successes and obstacles to the Detroit River cleanup effort
include:
- Lack of Leadership:
Lack of leadership by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Michigan Department of
Environmental Quality has hindered implementation efforts in the Detroit River AOC. While the
State
of Michigan, under of memorandum of understanding with the Province of Ontario, accepted the
lead for
achieving restoration of the AOC, its Department of Environmental Quality now considers itself
only a
participant in the cleanup.
- The Detroit River AOC Requires a Higher Profile with Elected Officials:
Restoration of the Detroit River AOC requires that river cleanup become a high priority and be
maintained as a high priority with elected officials at all levels of government. This has occurred
in the
Rouge River AOC. Elected officials involvement in the Rouge River AOC has contributed
directly to
securing over $600 million in infrastructure improvements to address combined sewer overflows
and
urban stormwater runoff.
- Lack of Financial Commitment from Federal, State and Provincial Governments:
Local partnerships and financing provided by various sectors of the community should only be
supplementary sources of funding and not substitutes for a strong financial commitment by the
U.S. and
Canadian federal, state and provincial governments.
- Insufficient Examination and Evaluation of Restoration Options and Priorities:
The 1996 Detroit River RAP Report identified 104 recommendations. No mechanism is currently
in
place to evaluate these options relative to achieving the desired future state of the Detroit River.
Contaminated sediment remediation receives no higher priority for funding than restoration of fish
and
wildlife habitat. The limited available funds should be invested in remedial actions that will
provide
optimal environmental net benefit.
- Limited Business and Industrial Involvement in AOC Restoration:
Barriers and incentives to business and industrial involvement must be identified to ensure
meaningful
involvement. As restoration progresses, there could be considerable benefits from establishing a
community partnership organization for cleanup of the Detroit River and contaminated sediments.
- Limited Commitment to Monitoring:
Historically, there was an extensive monitoring program for the Detroit River to assess water
quality,
estimate loadings of pollutants, identify pollution "hot spots" and evaluate program effectiveness.
Due to
budget cuts and changing priorities, these monitoring programs have been substantially cut or
eliminated.
- Inadequate Citizen Involvement and Consultation:
There is too little public awareness or acceptance of the need to restore uses in the Detroit River.
Greater
effort must be expended to inform citizens, including school age children, regarding current
environmental conditions and specific restoration goals. IJC found no evidence of specific
outreach
programs directed at the most impacted subset of the AOC's population. In particular, more
effort is
required to inform subsistence fishers of the risks from the consumption of environmentally
contaminated fish.
- Notable Successes:
Notable successes in restoration include: Habitat rehabilitation and conservation projects
implemented
at Detroit's Belle Isle Park, Windsor's Coventry, Reaume, and Alexander Parks, Ruwe March and
the
Canadian Salt Company facility; pollution prevention efforts of Chrysler, Ford and General
Motors in
both the U.S. and Canada; removal of 20,000 cubic yards of contaminated sediment from
Monguagon
Creek; more than 1 billion dollars worth of upgrades to wastewater treatment operations in both
Detroit
and Windsor; and initial steps being taken by elected officials in Detroit and Windsor in
cooperation with
local companies to establish a local organization to improve the Detroit River waterfront.
The governments of the U.S. and Canada, in a 1987 Protocol to The Great Lakes
Water Quality
Agreement, designated 42 Areas of Concern around the Great Lakes Basin, such as the
Detroit River,
where poor water quality had caused or was likely to cause impairments to human uses of the
water and
its ability to support aquatic life.
IJC is a binational Canada-United States organization established by The Boundary Waters
Treaty of 1909 to help the two Governments prevent and resolve disputes over use of waters
along the
U.S. and Canada boundary. Under the 1978 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, IJC
assesses progress
by the two counties to restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the
waters
of the Great Lakes basin ecosystem. The full text of this report is available on the Internet at
http://www.ijc.org/php/publications/html/detroit.html(.)
http://www.ijc.org/rel/news.dtwsanews.html