DECIDING WHEN TO INTERVENE

Data Interpretation Tools for Making Sediment Management Decisions Beyond Source Control

Based on a Workshop to Evaluate Data Interpretation Tools used to Make Sediment Management Decisions held at the Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research at the University of Windsor on December 1-2, 1998

Prepared by: Gail Krantzberg, John Hartig, Lisa Maynard, Kelly Burch, and Carol Ancheta
Sediment Priority Action Committee
Great Lakes Water Quality Board

1999


APPENDIX 12

ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR THE CONTAMINATED HARBOR SEDIMENT ADJACENT TO THE ASHLAND, WISCONSIN LAKEFRONT PROPERTY - KREHER PARK

Bob Paulson
Wisconsin DNR
101 S. Webster Street, P.O. Box 7921
Madison, Wisconsin 53707-7921
(608) 266-7790
paulsr@dnr.state.wi.us

Introduction

The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) through Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. (SEH) recently completed an Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) for the contaminated sediment in an area that comprised approximately 4.05 hectares of the harbor that extends from 92 to 213 m off shore from Kreher Park in water less than 3.05 m deep and between jetties to the east and west. Previous investigations have identified the contaminants of concern as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon compounds (PAHs). The contaminants are associated with black tarry materials and appear to be most concentrated at the interface of a wood chip layer (that covers a large part of the area to an average depth of 22.5 cm) and the underlying fine sands and silty sands. The contamination was generally present in the upper 3.05 m of the sandy sediment and decreased with depth till underlying, cohesive parent materials were reached.

Contaminants sources

Given the large area of bottom sediment contaminated and the visible black, tarry characteristics associated with the contamination, there is only a limited number of possible contributing sources to this type of contamination. A major contributing source was likely releases of coal tar wastes from the Manufactured Gas Plant (MGP) that operated up on the bluff from the late 1800s until 1947. MGPs generated gas for residential heating and lighting from heating coal in retorts. Coal tars were a by-product of the gas generation process. Disposal of waste products were largely unregulated during the period of active coal gas production. Coal tars from the Ashland MGP have been identified in the ravine off of the bluff, the deep groundwater aquifer, and in the filled area of the Ashland Lakefront property.

As more and more MGP sites are being investigated around the state, coal tar wastes are being found in the bottom sediment of surface waters associated with a large number of the sites. Even 40-50 years after the MGPs have ceased operating, the coal tar wastes have remained at or near the sediment surface and at a depth to impact aquatic resources on a continuing and long-term basis. Organic and metal compounds from MGP wastes are toxic to bottom-dwelling organisms and can be released from bottom sediment by various means to the overlying water in dissolved forms, associated with suspended particulates, or as separate oils, all of which may be available and toxic to fish and other aquatic organisms. Coal tar wastes may contain thousands of organic compounds of which there is the ability to routinely analyze and identify only a portion. Many of the unidentified may be as equally toxic as those that can be identified.

Ecological risk assessment

The purpose of the ERA was to estimate the current and future risks and impacts from contaminants of concern present in the surface waters and sediment of the site to plants, fish, and other aquatic organisms that would normally occupy the site habitats and birds and wildlife that may use the habitats as part of their foraging base. A previous assessment looked at the risks to human health from exposure to the site contaminants.

The ERA used a weight of evidence approach to link the observed and measured sediment and water contamination found at the site to actual and predicted impacts to fish and other aquatic organisms that may use the harbor area off of the Lakefront property. The weight of evidence approach depends on using multiple methods of associating the contaminants levels to effects to different organisms who are exposed to the contaminants by different exposure routes.

The weight of evidence of impacts was built on the following:

Integration of the above study components leads the WDNR to conclude that the ecological risks associated with the contaminated sediment off of the Ashland Lakefront property are likely to be high for the present and for the long-term. Given the bottom characteristics, PAHs will not attenuate or naturally beak down over time as evidenced by their toxicity 50-60 years after being released to the harbor. Risks and impacts to the insects, worms, crustacea, and other species that inhabit the bottom substrates for all or some portion of their life cycles and for water column organisms such as immature fish, are expected to be highest. The bottom-dwelling community serves as part of the food chain that supports higher trophic levels or larger consumers such as fish. It is likely the bottom dwelling community is limited as a food source at the site, and those organisms that can survive may accumulate PAH contaminants and pass them onto higher level consumers. Immature fish impacted by the site contaminants also means a possible loss of a food base for higher level consumers and loss of fish stock to the bay and the lake. The health of larger fish utilizing the area may also be impaired.

Some of the PAH contaminants at the site have the unique characteristic of having their toxicity to bottom-dwelling and water column organisms such as fish enhanced or increased by sunlight that can penetrate through the water to the bottom substrates and activates the PAHs in the process (Table 1). In all the above cases, the direct evidence indicates that the shallow nearshore habitat off the Ashland Lakefront property is impaired and not supporting a healthy, balanced community of aquatic organisms. These impacts may have secondary impacts to higher trophic level organisms such as birds and wildlife that use the habitat as a foraging base.

Feasibility study for sediment remediation

Based on the results of the ERA, the WDNR will be undertaking a feasibility study to evaluate remedial alternatives for the contaminated sediment of the site. The overall objective for remediating the contaminated sediment off of the Lakefront property is to protect the unique resources of the Chequamegon Bay and Lake Superior Ecosystems. All necessary means will be taken to protect these resources from any degree of degradation or impairment.

Summary of ecological risk assessment - weight of evidence

Benthic Community:

Aquatic Community:

Terrestial Community:

Identification

Site identification:

Ashland Harbor site identification:

Tiered approach

Field collections at Ashland Harbor site

Sediment chemistries:

Surface water samples:

Biological studies:

Ashland Harbor sediment toxicity testing

4 Sample sites:

Solid phase tests:

Sediment Elutriate tests:

Photo-enhanced Toxicity tests:

Table 1. PAH Sediment Concentrations and Related Toxicity Units at the Study Sites


Type of Bottom Substrate Sampled Total PAHs mg/kg (dry wt.) Sum of UV Toxic PAHs1 Organic Carbon Normalized mg PAH/kg TOC Total Toxic Units2

Based on dry wt. Organic Carbon Normalized

Reference sand .424 40.9 1 7
Contaminated sand .145 15 7 119
Reference wood 6.543 41.1 31 14
Contaminated wood 370.2 8,294 1,711 3,728

  1. PAHs identified to be associated with phototoxic effects based on the literature - anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, dibenzo(a)anthracene, pyrene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, and benzo(g,h,i)perylene.

  2. Based on Ingersoll HA 28 d ERM values or Effect Range - Median values. ERM values associated with frequent or probable adverse biological effects.

Sediment concentration of the PAH compound/HA 28 d ERM concentration for the PAH compound = Toxic Units.

Toxic Units for individual PAHs at a site are summed to derive a Total Toxic Unit value for the sample site.