REFERENCES (Sections 1.4 - 1.7)
Ariya, P.A., A. Khalizov, and A. Gidas (2002). Reactions of gaseous
Dolan, D. M., K. P. McGunagle, S. Perry, and E. Voldner (1993).
mercury with atomic and molecular halogens; kinetics,
Source Investigation for Lake Superior.  International Joint
product studies, and atmospheric implications. J. Phys.
Commission, Windsor, Ontario.
Chem. A 106, 7310-7320.
Draxler, R. R. and G. D. Hess (1998).  An overview of the
Beauchamp, S., N. Burgess, A. D’Entremont, R. Tordon, G. Brun,
HYSPLIT_4 modelling system for trajectories, dispersion and
D. Leger, W. Schroeder, and J. Abraham (1997).  Mercury in
deposition.  Australian Met. Mag. 47, 295.
air, water and biota in Kejimkujik National Park, Nova Scotia,
Canada.  Proceedings of the Third International Conference
Draxler, R. R. (2000).  Meteorological factors of ozone predictabil-
of Science and the Management of Protected Areas, Calgary.
ity at Houston, Texas.  J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc.  50, 259-
May 12-16, 1997 (Maintaining Ecological Integrity and
Draxler, R. R., J. T. McQueen, B.J.B. Stunder.  Atmos. Environ.
Bullock, O.R., and K.A. Brehme (2002).  Atmospheric mercury
1994, 2197.
simulation using the CMAQ model: formulation description
and analysis of wet deposition results.  Atmos. Environ, 36,
Draxler, R. R. (1991).  The accuracy of trajectories during ANATEX
calculated using a dynamic model analyses versus rawin-
sonde observations.  J. Appl. Met.  30,1446-1467.
Bullock, O.R.  (2000).  Modeling assessment of transport and
depositionpatterns of anthropogenic mercury air emissions
Dvonch, J. T., J. R. Graney, F. J. Marsik, G. J. Keeler, and R. K.
in the United States and Canada. Sci. Tot. Environ.  259, 145-
Stevens (1998).  An investigation of source-receptor
relationships for mercury in south Florida using event
precipitation data.  Sci. Tot. Environ.  213:95-108
Bullock, O.R., K.A. Brehme, and G.R. Mapp (1998).  Lagrangian
modeling of mercury air emission, transport and deposition:
Gardfeldt, K. and M. Jonnson (2003).  Is bimolecular reduction of
An analysis of model sensitivity to emissions uncertainty.  Sci.
Hg(II)-complexes possible in aqueous systems of environ-
Tot. Environ.  213, 1-12.
mental importance? J. Phys. Chem. A, in press.
Burke, J., M. Hoyer, G. Keeler, and T. Scherbatskoy(1995).  Wet
Gustin, M. S. (2003).  Are mercury emissions from geologic
deposition of mercury and ambient mercury concentrations
sources significant? A status report.  Sci. Tot. Environ.  304,
at a site in the Lake Champlain basin.  Water, Air and Soil
Pollution 80, 353-362.  This paper describes data collection
efforts that have been ongoing since 1992.
Hall, B. (1995).  The gas phase oxidation of elemental mercury by
ozone.  Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 80, 301-315.
Cohen, M., R. Draxler, R. Artz, B. Commoner, P. Bartlett, P. Cooney,
K. Couchot, A. Dickar, H. Eisl, C. Hill, J. Quigley, J. E.
Hoyer, M., J. Burke, and G. Keeler (1995).  Atmospheric sources,
Rosenthal, D. Neimi, D. Ratte, M. Deslauriers, R. Laurin, L.
transport and deposition of mercury in Michigan: two years
Mathewson-Brake, and J. McDonald (2002).  Modeling the
of event precipitation.  Water Air and Soil Pollution 80, 199-
atmospheric transport and deposition of PCDD/F to the Great
Lakes.  Environ. Sci. Technol.  36, 4831-4845.
Keeler, G. (2001).  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.  Personal
Cohen, M., B. Commoner, H. Eisl, P. Bartlett, A. Dickar, C. Hill, J.
Quigley, and J. Rosenthal (1995).  Quantitative Estimation
of the entry of dioxins, furans, and hexachlorobenzene into
the Great Lakes from airborne and waterborne sources.
Center for the Biology of Natural Systems (CBNS), Queens
College, Flushing, New York.